Thank you for supporting me (Nick Broad) and busk.co with a free subscription to this newsletter. Please consider upgrading for as little as $6/month or $60/year to contribute to our essential work in this moment.

If you do that, you’ll receive bonus features like “closing my tabs”, available only to paid subscribers—in addition to supporting our work.

[Note: if you haven’t already, click here to read part 1]

7. The indoor music industry is getting even worse

Were the record labels ever any good? From the very beginning they:

  • got artists to sign exploitative contracts so that even their musical stars died in poverty (especially if they were black)

  • had white people re-record the songs of black musicians without giving attribution or paying royalties

  • illegally paid DJs for decades to sideline rivals’ popular works

  • enabled powerful men to prey on young, vulnerable women

  • censored the lyrics of their own singers to ensure marketability

  • and pressured them to produce derivative, formulaic music

Much of that still goes on. But, now the labels have added new tricks, like ‘auto-tuning’ the voices of tone-deaf singers so that they can even more shamelessly package sex as music (as The Buggles wrote in 1979, video killed the radio star).

Also, industry consolidation means that today just three gatekeepers (Universal, Sony and Warner) now control 70-80% of the market. Add to that the impact of digital streaming (discussed below), and the indoor music industry looks bleak.

Consider this: international press widely reported that Taylor Swift purchasing her own music was a success story:

But once you look at the numbers, it seems less like a win and more like a boon for big capital. Scooter Braun made $265 million in profit from her music, the hedge fund Shamrock Capital probably earned around $100 million, and Swift spent $360 million of her own money—equalling the profits made by the other two—to purchase it.

In my opinion, even this “success story” is evidence that the power is in the wrong hands.

Maybe you disagree? Let me know in the comments below — Did Swift do well? Is the music industry working as intended? Do you hope to get signed yourself, or did you at the beginning of your career? If so, what worried you most about getting signed? If you did get signed, was it a good deal?

How busking addresses this problem

Innovation has never come from the labels, it’s always come from the streets, whether that’s the blues in the rural south, Doo Wop in the industrial north, rock on both sides of the Atlantic, Hip Hop in Harlem and the Bronx, or innumerable other genres created by buskers over the last century.

Busking provides artists with the kind of artistic freedom they’ll never get from a label. It also provides an income, without first needing a gatekeeper to judge them on their looks.

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to The Busking Project Mailing List to continue reading.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found